Thanks to the 100th anniversary of RMS Titanic’s Sinking, I’ve been on a Titanic kick for the past few days. I’ve re-watched James Cameron’s 1997 film, I’ve read all I could on Wikipedia, and I discovered Titanic: Echo of the Dying Confession by Troy Veenstra.
That screenshot foreshadows my experience of this book. I know we all make mistakes with typos, but somehow “Pice resently” does not strike me as a typo. I also read one of the reviews that there were “misuse of words” and other errors that could have been done on purpose to give the journal entries a rushed feel due to it being written by someone who’s at the end of their life.
I usually do not rate stuff, but for this, I will rate this book a 2 out of 5. I have to admit, I really enjoyed the premise of the plot, which focuses on an “unnamed” man confessing to rigging the sinking of the Titanic. The unnamed man is supposed to be J. Bruce Ismay, the director of White Star Line. (Highlight to see.) He writes his confession as journal entries, and the entries show us why he decided to damn the ship. The story includes the historical events and facts quite well, but I think there are some parts that may not have been accurate.
Really, I think this story had excellent potential, but it falls short with its grammar and spelling errors and words misuse. I can accept mistakes adding realism to the entries, but I think it was overdone to the point where it greatly distracted the flow and it pulled me away from the story. The errors also made me question the author’s ability to write and his editors to edit. I cannot remember reading a story that had so much semicolon in one novel. I also hated how the author consistently did not use a comma to separate names or titles in the sentence (ie: How are you today, Captain Smith? would be “How are you today Captain Smith?”). Not using a comma to offset a person’s name or title . . . it made for a very confusing read.
Ergo, do I recommend this book? Only if you can ignore the bazillion mistakes.